USGS - science for a changing world

Access USGS - San Francisco Bay and Delta

Hydroclimate Home
Access Home
The Spring Runoff Pulse from the Sierra Nevada
D.R. Cayan(1,2), D.H. Peterson (2), L. Riddle(1), M.D. Dettinger(2), and R. Smith(2)
(1)Climate Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA
(2)United States Geological Survey, Water Resources Division
From the Interagency Ecological Studies Program for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary Newsletter, Summer 1997, p. 25-28.

Abstract

A spring runoff pulse is identified in the Merced River record from the Sierra Nevada, that makes the transition from low streamflow conditions in winter to the high streamflow conditions in the later spring-early summer period. The timing of the pulse is delayed with greater seasonal accumulation of snow pack in the Yosemite region. Also, the runoff pulse is triggered by a regional weather fluctuation that establishes a warm high pressure ridge over the California region during the spring (mid-March to Mid-May) period. Since this ridge often blankets the entire western United States, it is found that a simultaneous pulse occurs over a broad collection of high-elevation streams in the region.

Snowmelt

Introduction

Snowmelt runoff from the Sierra Nevada constitutes a large component of the California water supply and contributes greatly to the freshwater budget associated with the San Francisco Bay system. Interestingly, just about every year there is one pulse of snowmelt runoff (streamflow) that marks the transition of the Sierra climate from winter to spring. Three examples during the early 1980's from Merced River Happy Isles hydrographs show a very late spring pulse (1983), a very early spring pulse (1985), and a fairly average time of the spring pulse (1980) in Figure 1. The record of daily flows (1948 - 1996) at Happy Isles in Yosemite National Park provides a convenient history from which we identified the spring pulse (Figure 2).

Spring runoff pulse at Happy Isles gage of Merced River in Yosemite National Park. Initial day of pulse is marked by triangle. Solid and dashed curves show actual daily and smoothed flows for each of selected years

Figure 1. Spring runoff pulse at Happy Isles gage of Merced River in Yosemite National Park. Initial day of pulse is marked by triangle. Solid and dashed curves show actual daily and smoothed flows for each of selected years.

Time history of the initial day of the spring runoff pulse over the period (1948 - 1993) as a time series and as a histogram

Figure 2. Time history of the initial day of the spring runoff pulse over the period (1948 - 1993) as a time series and as a histogram. Average time of onset is April 19, with a spread from March 15 to May 15. Note tendency for advance of pulse, about 7 days over the 48-year period. Also note tendency for spring pulse to occur later in spring during La Nina years (blue circles), while no decided pattern is evident during El Nino years (red circles).

The marked increase in the flow over what would be expected from climatological spring conditions is shown in Figure 3, which is the composite streamflow of the Merced Happy Isles record corresponding to its spring pulse period, from the initial day through 19 days later. The composite is constructed from averaging 43 cases of Happy Isles Merced River pulse episodes. In comparison is shown the climatological mean Merced streamflow over the same 43 years, but for the fixed period of April 19 - May 6 which is centered during the overall average period of the spring pulse. A statistical test (one tailed t-test) indicates that the rise in streamflow during the pulse period is greater than climatological streamflow at a high level of confidence (> 95% confidence). It is not uncommon for the flow to increase three- or four-fold over the 20 days after the pulse begins; the flow during the pulse period reaches values twice that expected by climatology.

Flow at Merced River, Happy Isles corresponding to spring pulse period, from initial day through 19 days later

Figure 3. Flow at Merced River, Happy Isles corresponding to spring pulse period, from initial day through 19 days later. Solid curve is composite flow constructed from averaging 43 cases of Happy Isles Merced River pulse episodes. Dashed curve is climatological mean flow over same 43 years, for April 19-May 6. Dots indicate instances where the composite flow of the Happy Isles pulse days exceed the climatological flow with a statistical confidence level of 95%, from a one-tailed t-test.

But what causes this pulse, and why is it so sudden?

Two Influences: Seasonal snow accumulation and spring weather patterns

To get at the origin of the spring runoff pulses, we examined the history of the pulse times over the 48-year Happy Isles record (1948-1995) in Yosemite National Park in association with various climate and weather conditions.

First, in Figure 4, the Merced River Happy Isles record shows that the pulse comes earlier in years with low discharge (light snowpack) and later in years with high discharge (heavy snowpack). This may result from two effects: (1) the heavier the total annual flow, the more likely that there is a long winter; and (2) the greater the snowpack, the longer the period of heating that is required to bring it to the melting state.

Initial day of the spring runoff pulse plotted according to total water year discharge

Figure 4. Initial day of the spring runoff pulse plotted according to total water year discharge. Higher discharge is associated with later spring snowmelt surge, accounting for 35% of the variance of the timing of the= pulse.

However, there is also a synoptic weather influence. Given the time of the pulse for each year, we composited (averaged) the 700-mb height anomalies and daily maximum temperature over a sequence from 5-days-before through 5-days-after the initial day of the pulse. For brevity, in Figure 5 we show the 700-mb height and maximum temperature anomalies only for the third day after onset of the pulse. The 700-mb height is a good measure of atmospheric circulation (speed and direction of the winds, about 3 km above sea level) and provides a history that covers the period since World War II. The composite sequence of 700-mb height anomaly maps clearly shows that the pulse is conditioned by an orderly atmospheric pattern: a cool, wet period with a trough (negative 700-mb height anomalies) along the West Coast preceding the spring pulse moves through, and is succeeded by the development of a strong ridge of high pressure (positive 700-mb height anomalies) that blankets the western United States. This high pressure ridge produces warm air and probably makes cloud-free skies -- elements conducive to melting the winter snowpack. The composite daily maximum temperature anomalies (Figure 5b) reinforce the picture of a cool pattern over the West evolving into a warm pattern, provided by the circulation maps.

Northern Hemisphere daily atmospheric circulation

Figure 5. Northern Hemisphere daily atmospheric circulation (700 mbar height anomalies) and maximum temperature as a composite on the third day after the initial day of the spring runoff pulse. Click on image for full-size view.

(top) Composite is average over 43 years of the 700-mb height anomaly field, gridded at 5 deg latitude by 10 deg longitude of the Northern Hemisphere. Red/blue shading represents posoitive/negative 700-mb height anomalies (higher/lower than average pressure). Contour interval is 10 meters. Note development of storm ridge over western U.S., which promoties marked warming.

(bottom) Temperature anomalies are a 2.5 deg gridded set from the first order and cooperative station observations. The red/blue shading represents warmer/cooler temperature anomalies. Color intervals are at 1 deg F increments. Note how cool pattern precedes the pulse episode corresponding to negative 700-mb height anomalies along the West Coast and is replaced by strong warming blanketing the entire West, corresponding to development of high pressure ridge over the region.

Interestingly, the record (Figure 2) shows a subtle trend toward the pulse occurring earlier, amounting to an advance of about 7 days over the 46 years since 1948. Studies by Roos (1987, 1991) and Wahl (1992) have documented this trend; Aguado et al. (1992) and Dettingere and Cayan (1995) have shown that the trend is from multiple factors but especialy from warmer winters yielding earlier runof in the Sierras. Dettinger and Cayan 1995) show that this trend is most pronounced in middle elevation snow-fed catchments, noting that the high elevation Merced basin contains some of this signal. Also while there is not a usefu link to El Nino years, there is a suggestion (Figure 2) that the springs following the mature phase La Nina events tend to have the pulse delayed from the climatological timing.

Since the atmospheric pattern that drives the runoff pulse covers a broad region, could it be that the Happy Isles record provides an index of spirng high elevation snowmelt over a much broader region?

The spring pulse as a Western U.S. phenomenon

Because the atmospheric pattern that drives the runoff pulse covers a broad region, could it be that the Happy Isles record provides an index of spirng high elevation snowmelt over a much broader region?

An important feature of the 700-mb circulation and temperature anomaly maps described above is that they cover a large region, much broader than the Merced River, or indeed the entire Sierra Nevada. Using the Happy Isles Spring pulse record, a large set of 344 streamflow records from the USGS streamflow HCDN historical climate set (Slack and Landwehr, 1992) was interrogated. After investigating the daily hydrographs from a variety of regions, we considered an index designed to measure the behavior of the western streams in association with the Happy Isles pulse from its inception to its completion. An initial investigation of the ensemble of spring hydrographs for other selected streams (not shown) indicates that other high elevation watersheds in the Rocky Mountains are surging above climatological levels at the same time as the Merced River spring pulse.

Conclusions

1. Spring Pulse: High elevation Sierra runoff, as indicated by the Merced River Happy Isles stream gage record in Yosemite National Park, usually undergoes a pulse of high flow in spring that marks the transition from low winter flow to high spring/early summer flow. This pulse has considerably larger flows than would be expected from the increase in climatological mean flow in spring, and it usually has a much sharper rise. Because of this abrupt onset of the spring pulse, it would be very valuable to understand and predict the character of the pulse in a given year.

2. Atmospheric Forcing: Both seasonal snow accumulation (late fall through spring), and spring atmospheric circulation play an important role in the timing of the spring pulse. Usually, a larger accumulated snowpack produces a later spring pulse. The spring weather pattern that triggers the pulse features a strong western high pressure ridge; this atmospheric forcing produces widespread warming presumably because of strong solar heating of the snowpack.

3. Western U.S. Coherent Pulse: Importantly, there is an overall coherent pattern of spring pulse over the high elevation watersheds in the West. Inspection of the western U.S. stream gage dataset indicates that the Happy Isles record provides an index of the spring pulse over a much broader region of the high elevations including the Sierras and the Rocky Mountains. Thus, the Merced Happy Isles gage provides a convenient index of a widespread western U.S. spring runoff pulse, although it may not be the optimum such index. Work to better elucidate this pattern, and to identify coherent schemes for predicting the spring pulse, is underway by USGS researchers, along with collaborations with Scripps Institution of Oceanography, NOAA Climate Diagnostics Center, and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

References

Aguado, E., D.R. Cayan, L. Riddle, and M. Roos, 1992. Climatic fluctuations and timing of West Coast streamflow. J. of Clim., 5, 1468-1483.

Dettinger, M. D. and D. R. Cayan, 1995. Large-scale atmospheric forcing of recent trends toward early snowmelt runoff in California. J. of Clim., 8, 606-623.

Dettinger, M.D., D Peterson, H. Diaz, and D. Cayan, 1997. Forecasting spring runoff pulses from the Sierra Nevada. Interagency Ecological Program Newsletter, ed. R. Brown, Calilfornia Department of Water Resources, Summer 1997, 32-35.

D. Peterson, Dettinger, M.D., D Cayan, R. Smith, L. Riddle, and N. Knowles 1997: What a difference a day makes: spring snowmelt in the Sierras. Interagency Ecological Program Newsletter, ed. R. Brown, California Department of Water Resources, Summer 1997, 16-19.

Roos, M., 1987. Possible changes in California snowmelt patterns. Proceedings, Fourth Pacific Climate Workshop, Pacific Grove, CA, 141-150.

Roos, M., 1991. A trend of decreasing snowmelt runoff in northern California. Proceedings, 59th Western Snow Conference, Juneau, AK, 29-36.

Slack, J.R. and J.M. Landwehr, 1992. Hydro-climatic data network (HCDN): AUSGS streamflow data set for the United States for the study of climate variations, 1874-1988. USGS Open-File Report 92-129, 193 pp.

Wahl, K.L., 1992. Evaluation of trends in runoff in the western United States. Managing Water Resources During Global Change. Proceedings, American Water Resources Association 28th Annual Conference and Symposium, Reno, NV, American Water Resources Association, 701-710.

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USAGov: Government Made Easy U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
URL:http://sfbay.wr.usgs.gov/hydroclimate/pulse.html
Page Last Modified: Thursday, 13-Dec-2007 12:22:23 PST